Skip to main content
All games

Bryant vs Army: prediction and projected score

Final: Bryant 3, Army 59. We projected Army 43.2-4.8 (99%) โ€” winner called correctly.

Matchup analysis

Before kickoff our model projected Army 43.2, Bryant 4.8 at Michie Stadium in Week 1. That is a heavy edge: Army wins about 99% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 38.4 points and 47.9 combined points. Tags: favorite holds, blowout brewing, leans low scoring.

Bryant is 1-0, scoring 24 and allowing 6 points per game (+18 per game). Army has not played a game yet this season, so its number leans on last year's results.

Bryant plays in the FCS, so this is a cross-division game. Our ratings put FCS teams on the FBS scale through a measured gap from every FBS-vs-FCS result, which is why Army's projected edge is large even if the records look similar. Cross-division projections are a little less precise than FBS-vs-FBS ones.

College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between Army by 16 and Army by 61 about 80% of the time.

Army gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour Army by about 36.3. The game is on CBSSN.

Result: Bryant 3, Army 59. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 17.6 points and the total by 14.1.

Market lines

Market lines ยท Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network ยท Updated Oct 29, 9:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.

ProviderSpread (open โ†’ now)Total (open โ†’ now)Moneyline (Bryant / Army)
ConsensusArmy -36.75 โ†’ Army -37.2550.5 โ†’ 51โ€” / โ€”
BovadaArmy -3750.5โ€” / โ€”
DraftKingsArmy -36.5 โ†’ Army -37.551.5โ€” / โ€”

This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com ยท read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.

ProjectionMarginTotalArmy win
Our modelArmy -38.547.999%
Market consensusArmy -37.551.099%
Blended projectionArmy -37.551.599%

Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).

Model vs market

Army win probability
model 99% ยท market (no-vig) โ€”
Margin
model Army -38.4 ยท market Army -37.25 ยท difference +1.1 pts (Army view)
Total
model 47.9 ยท market 51 ยท difference -3.1

Model margin is 1.1 pts more toward Army than the market.

21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Original projection vs new formula

ProjectionScoreWin probMargin missTotal miss
Original projectionBryant 4.8, Army 43.2Army 99%right winner17.614.1
New formulaBryant 10.9, Army 39.8Army 95%right winner27.111.3

Final: Bryant 3, Army 59. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.

Bryant vs Army: stat comparison

2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).

Basic
StatBryantArmy
Points per game22.523.8#94
Points allowed per game30.321.6#39
Yards per play5.355.11#124
Yards per play allowed6.085.81#70
Rushing yards per game128.8252.5#4
Net passing yards per game227.583.9#136
Rushing yards allowed per game156.2158.2#62
Net passing yards allowed per game270.4191.6#32
Turnovers per game1.830.85#37
Takeaways per game1.001.08#67
Sacks per game1.751.08#130
Sacks allowed per game1.250.38#1
Advanced
StatBryantArmy
EPA per play-0.10+0.04#57
EPA per play allowed+0.08+0.05#92
Success rate37.2%41.7%#81
Success rate allowed44.9%44.4%#105
Explosive play rate9.0%7.7%#136
Explosive plays allowed13.4%11.7%#52
Havoc rate11.2%9.6%#129
Havoc allowed12.8%7.8%#1
Points per scoring opportunity2.514.03#66
Points per opportunity allowed3.183.87#69
Average starting field positionopp 15own 30#47
Opponents' starting field positionopp 14own 31#94
Offensive plays per game (pace)66.665.8#73
Situational
StatBryantArmy
Rushing EPA per play-0.08+0.02#77
Passing EPA per play-0.14+0.17#20
Rushing EPA allowed-0.01+0.03#88
Passing EPA allowed+0.18+0.07#90
Rushing success rate39.6%42.6%#80
Passing success rate37.8%36.7%#112
Run stuff rate18.1%12.8%#3
Passing-down success rate25.4%28.9%#83
Passing-down success allowed34.8%29.6%#73
Third-down conversion rate35.8%43.4%#46
Third-down rate allowed48.0%46.0%#122
Red-zone touchdown rate27.9%65.8%#42
Red-zone TD rate allowed47.5%60.0%#70

# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.

More: Bryant schedule ยท Army schedule ยท all Week 1 projections

Share this prediction

Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.

Free weekly projections email

One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only โ€” no spam, unsubscribe any time.