Matchup analysis
Before kickoff our model projected Pittsburgh 32.8, UCF 21.5 at Acrisure Stadium in Week 2. That is a solid edge: Pittsburgh wins about 77% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 11.3 points and 54.3 combined points.
UCF is 1-0, scoring 73 and allowing 6 points per game (+67 per game). Pittsburgh is 1-0, scoring 59 and allowing 14 points per game (+45 per game).
UCF's middle-of-the-pack offense (46th of 138 in our opponent-adjusted ratings, worth about 29.3 points against an average defense) meets Pittsburgh's middle-of-the-pack defense (44th) — an even matchup on paper, so game script and turnovers will decide how many points UCF puts up. Pittsburgh's strong offense (16th of 138 in our opponent-adjusted ratings, worth about 35.4 points against an average defense) has the clear edge over UCF's middle-of-the-pack defense (49th); that mismatch is where most of Pittsburgh's projected points come from.
College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between UCF by 11 and Pittsburgh by 34 about 80% of the time.
Pittsburgh gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour Pittsburgh by about 9.2. The game is on ESPN2.
Result: UCF 7, Pittsburgh 12. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 6.3 points and the total by 35.3.
Market lines
Market lines · Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network · Updated Oct 29, 9:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.
| Provider | Spread (open → now) | Total (open → now) | Moneyline (UCF / Pittsburgh) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Pittsburgh -8 → Pittsburgh -7.25 | 54.25 → 55.25 | +245 / -299 |
| DraftKings | Pittsburgh -8.5 → Pittsburgh -7.5 | 51.5 → 55.5 | +240 / -298 |
| Bovada | Pittsburgh -7.5 → Pittsburgh -7 | 57 → 55 | +250 / -300 |
This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com · read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.
| Projection | Margin | Total | Pittsburgh win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | Pittsburgh -11.5 | 54.3 | 77% |
| Market consensus | Pittsburgh -7.5 | 55.3 | 72% |
| Blended projection | Pittsburgh -8 | 55.6 | 71% |
Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).
Model vs market
- Pittsburgh win probability
- model 77% · market (no-vig) 72% · difference +5 pts
- Margin
- model Pittsburgh -11.3 · market Pittsburgh -7.25 · difference +4.1 pts (Pittsburgh view)
- Total
- model 54.3 · market 55.25 · difference -1.0
Model margin is 4.1 pts more toward Pittsburgh than the market.
21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.
Original projection vs new formula
| Projection | Score | Win prob | Margin miss | Total miss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original projection | UCF 21.5, Pittsburgh 32.8 | Pittsburgh 77%right winner | 6.3 | 35.3 |
| New formula | UCF 23.4, Pittsburgh 36.8 | Pittsburgh 79%right winner | 8.4 | 41.3 |
Final: UCF 7, Pittsburgh 12. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.
UCF vs Pittsburgh: stat comparison
2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).
| Stat | UCF | Pittsburgh |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 24.3#90 | 33.7#20 |
| Points allowed per game | 23.6#57 | 24.8#68 |
| Yards per play | 6.09#50 | 6.07#51 |
| Yards per play allowed | 5.37#36 | 5.38#37 |
| Rushing yards per game | 166.8#70 | 139.8#109 |
| Net passing yards per game | 229.5#59 | 270.0#23 |
| Rushing yards allowed per game | 167.6#80 | 116.5#11 |
| Net passing yards allowed per game | 186.2#23 | 244.2#112 |
| Turnovers per game | 1.50#119 | 1.46#116 |
| Takeaways per game | 0.92#84 | 1.54#14 |
| Sacks per game | 2.00#69 | 2.23#49 |
| Sacks allowed per game | 1.67#54 | 3.00#124 |
| Stat | UCF | Pittsburgh |
|---|---|---|
| EPA per play | -0.02#102 | +0.02#79 |
| EPA per play allowed | -0.06#34 | -0.10#17 |
| Success rate | 39.6%#107 | 40.9%#95 |
| Success rate allowed | 43.4%#94 | 35.1%#9 |
| Explosive play rate | 11.9%#83 | 15.1%#14 |
| Explosive plays allowed | 11.2%#40 | 10.1%#23 |
| Havoc rate | 12.3%#74 | 15.8%#9 |
| Havoc allowed | 12.2%#76 | 15.2%#123 |
| Points per scoring opportunity | 3.67#101 | 3.85#81 |
| Points per opportunity allowed | 3.51#32 | 3.95#77 |
| Average starting field position | own 28#108 | own 33#11 |
| Opponents' starting field position | own 30#88 | own 32#117 |
| Offensive plays per game (pace) | 65.1#85 | 67.5#56 |
| Stat | UCF | Pittsburgh |
|---|---|---|
| Rushing EPA per play | -0.02#94 | -0.02#93 |
| Passing EPA per play | -0.02#92 | +0.05#63 |
| Rushing EPA allowed | +0.06#110 | -0.15#5 |
| Passing EPA allowed | -0.20#8 | -0.05#43 |
| Rushing success rate | 39.4%#105 | 41.4%#93 |
| Passing success rate | 39.0%#95 | 40.6%#75 |
| Run stuff rate | 22.2%#123 | 21.0%#110 |
| Passing-down success rate | 24.1%#126 | 30.4%#73 |
| Passing-down success allowed | 24.8%#12 | 25.1%#14 |
| Third-down conversion rate | 36.4%#108 | 35.8%#111 |
| Third-down rate allowed | 38.0%#44 | 34.4%#16 |
| Red-zone touchdown rate | 60.0%#74 | 52.5%#112 |
| Red-zone TD rate allowed | 69.3%#120 | 59.0%#59 |
# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.
More: UCF schedule · Pittsburgh schedule · all Week 2 projections
Share this prediction
Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.
Free weekly projections email
One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only — no spam, unsubscribe any time.