Skip to main content
All games

Texas Southern vs UTEP: prediction and projected score

Final: Texas Southern 10, UTEP 51. We projected UTEP 41.3-11.6 (97%) โ€” winner called correctly.

Matchup analysis

Before kickoff our model projected UTEP 41.3, Texas Southern 11.6 at Sun Bowl in Week 2. That is a heavy edge: UTEP wins about 97% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 29.6 points and 52.9 combined points. Tags: favorite holds, blowout brewing.

Texas Southern is 1-1, scoring 28 and allowing 41 points per game (-13 per game). UTEP is 0-1, scoring 0 and allowing 51 points per game (-51 per game).

Texas Southern plays in the FCS, so this is a cross-division game. Our ratings put FCS teams on the FBS scale through a measured gap from every FBS-vs-FCS result, which is why UTEP's projected edge is large even if the records look similar. Cross-division projections are a little less precise than FBS-vs-FBS ones.

College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between UTEP by 7 and UTEP by 52 about 80% of the time.

UTEP gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour UTEP by about 27.5. The game is on MW+.

Result: Texas Southern 10, UTEP 51. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 11.4 points and the total by 8.1.

Market lines

Market lines ยท Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network ยท Updated Oct 29, 9:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.

ProviderSpread (open โ†’ now)Total (open โ†’ now)Moneyline (Texas Southern / UTEP)
ConsensusUTEP -25.5 โ†’ UTEP -27.2552.75 โ†’ 53.5+1450 / -4250
BovadaUTEP -25.5 โ†’ UTEP -2753 โ†’ 53.5+1200 / -4000
DraftKingsUTEP -25.5 โ†’ UTEP -27.552.5 โ†’ 53.5+1700 / -4500

This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com ยท read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.

ProjectionMarginTotalUTEP win
Our modelUTEP -29.552.997%
Market consensusUTEP -27.553.594%
Blended projectionUTEP -2854.097%

Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).

Model vs market

UTEP win probability
model 97% ยท market (no-vig) 94% ยท difference +4 pts
Margin
model UTEP -29.6 ยท market UTEP -27.25 ยท difference +2.4 pts (UTEP view)
Total
model 52.9 ยท market 53.5 ยท difference -0.6

Model margin is 2.4 pts more toward UTEP than the market.

21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Original projection vs new formula

ProjectionScoreWin probMargin missTotal miss
Original projectionTexas Southern 11.6, UTEP 41.3UTEP 97%right winner11.48.1
New formulaTexas Southern 18.8, UTEP 37.7UTEP 87%right winner22.14.5

Final: Texas Southern 10, UTEP 51. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.

Texas Southern vs UTEP: stat comparison

2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).

Basic
StatTexas SouthernUTEP
Points per game22.323.3#99
Points allowed per game24.730.4#111
Yards per play5.425.29#112
Yards per play allowed6.025.36#35
Rushing yards per game180.6120.2#125
Net passing yards per game165.2224.8#70
Rushing yards allowed per game187.2181.1#92
Net passing yards allowed per game198.4208.8#53
Turnovers per game0.801.67#130
Takeaways per game1.100.75#112
Sacks per game0.802.33#38
Sacks allowed per game1.702.17#95
Advanced
StatTexas SouthernUTEP
EPA per play-0.01-0.10#125
EPA per play allowed+0.06-0.07#31
Success rate40.5%34.4%#134
Success rate allowed45.8%40.2%#51
Explosive play rate10.7%11.4%#101
Explosive plays allowed12.8%9.8%#17
Havoc rate9.8%12.7%#64
Havoc allowed11.9%13.8%#111
Points per scoring opportunity3.363.92#74
Points per opportunity allowed2.363.66#45
Average starting field positionopp 8own 29#100
Opponents' starting field positionopp 9own 31#106
Offensive plays per game (pace)63.865.2#84
Situational
StatTexas SouthernUTEP
Rushing EPA per play+0.05-0.01#91
Passing EPA per play-0.07-0.18#130
Rushing EPA allowed+0.11-0.12#13
Passing EPA allowed+0.01-0.01#61
Rushing success rate45.7%36.6%#126
Passing success rate38.0%30.9%#133
Run stuff rate16.5%22.0%#122
Passing-down success rate30.6%25.1%#122
Passing-down success allowed33.5%27.9%#44
Third-down conversion rate38.5%32.9%#131
Third-down rate allowed42.1%29.7%#4
Red-zone touchdown rate57.6%58.9%#84
Red-zone TD rate allowed49.2%56.8%#47

# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.

More: Texas Southern schedule ยท UTEP schedule ยท all Week 2 projections

Share this prediction

Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.

Free weekly projections email

One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only โ€” no spam, unsubscribe any time.