Skip to main content
All games

Central Connecticut vs Montana State: prediction and projected score

Final: Central Connecticut 30, Montana State 35. We projected Montana State 40.1-16.9 (94%) โ€” winner called correctly.

Matchup analysis

Before kickoff our model projected Montana State 40.1, Central Connecticut 16.9 at Bobcat Stadium (MT) in Week 3. That is a heavy edge: Montana State wins about 94% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 23.2 points and 57 combined points. Tags: favorite holds, blowout brewing.

Central Connecticut is 0-2, scoring 15 and allowing 61 points per game (-46 per game). Montana State is 3-0, scoring 41.7 and allowing 10.3 points per game (+31.4 per game).

College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between Montana State by 1 and Montana State by 46 about 80% of the time.

Montana State gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour Montana State by about 21.1. The game is on ESPN+.

Result: Central Connecticut 30, Montana State 35. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 18.2 points and the total by 8.

Market lines

Market lines ยท Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network ยท Updated Oct 29, 9:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.

ProviderSpread (open โ†’ now)Total (open โ†’ now)Moneyline (Central Connecticut / Montana State)
ConsensusMontana State -38.75 โ†’ Montana State -40.2559.75โ€” / โ€”
BovadaMontana State -3960โ€” / โ€”
DraftKingsMontana State -38.5 โ†’ Montana State -41.559.5โ€” / โ€”

This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com ยท read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.

ProjectionMarginTotalMontana State win
Our modelMontana State -2357.094%
Market consensusMontana State -40.559.8100%
Blended projectionMontana State -37.559.699%

Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).

Model vs market

Montana State win probability
model 94% ยท market (no-vig) โ€”
Margin
model Montana State -23.2 ยท market Montana State -40.25 ยท difference -17.0 pts (Montana State view)
Total
model 57.0 ยท market 59.75 ยท difference -2.7

Model margin is 17.0 pts more toward Central Connecticut than the market.

21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Original projection vs new formula

ProjectionScoreWin probMargin missTotal miss
Original projectionCentral Connecticut 16.9, Montana State 40.1Montana State 94%right winner18.28.0
New formulaCentral Connecticut 10.9, Montana State 49.3Montana State 99%right winner33.44.9

Final: Central Connecticut 30, Montana State 35. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.

Central Connecticut vs Montana State: stat comparison

2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).

Basic
StatCentral ConnecticutMontana State
Points per game26.737.9
Points allowed per game22.919.0
Yards per play5.647.07
Yards per play allowed5.975.48
Rushing yards per game140.3243.4
Net passing yards per game241.6214.0
Rushing yards allowed per game156.3137.9
Net passing yards allowed per game226.2241.3
Turnovers per game0.620.47
Takeaways per game0.851.40
Sacks per game2.151.73
Sacks allowed per game1.231.93
Advanced
StatCentral ConnecticutMontana State
EPA per play-0.00+0.19
EPA per play allowed+0.03+0.01
Success rate41.1%51.7%
Success rate allowed42.0%39.5%
Explosive play rate11.7%14.3%
Explosive plays allowed14.2%10.1%
Havoc rate12.8%11.5%
Havoc allowed11.6%12.2%
Points per scoring opportunity3.531.12
Points per opportunity allowed4.201.65
Average starting field positionopp 6opp 4
Opponents' starting field positionopp 6opp 4
Offensive plays per game (pace)67.764.7
Situational
StatCentral ConnecticutMontana State
Rushing EPA per play-0.13+0.12
Passing EPA per play+0.11+0.28
Rushing EPA allowed+0.06+0.10
Passing EPA allowed+0.01-0.06
Rushing success rate38.5%51.2%
Passing success rate45.7%52.9%
Run stuff rate21.1%15.1%
Passing-down success rate30.5%38.9%
Passing-down success allowed30.7%22.1%
Third-down conversion rate40.7%48.8%
Third-down rate allowed40.0%38.7%
Red-zone touchdown rate49.2%18.7%
Red-zone TD rate allowed63.9%28.2%

# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.

More: Central Connecticut schedule ยท Montana State schedule ยท all Week 3 projections

Share this prediction

Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.

Free weekly projections email

One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only โ€” no spam, unsubscribe any time.