Skip to main content
All games

Central Connecticut vs Mercyhurst: prediction and projected score

Final: Central Connecticut 43, Mercyhurst 40. We projected Central Connecticut 36.6-25.2 (77%) — winner called correctly.

Matchup analysis

Before kickoff our model projected Central Connecticut 36.6, Mercyhurst 25.2 at Saxon Stadium in Week 7. That is a solid edge: Central Connecticut wins about 77% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 11.4 points and 61.7 combined points. Tags: leans high scoring.

Central Connecticut is 2-3, scoring 31.2 and allowing 37 points per game (-5.8 per game). Mercyhurst is 1-5, scoring 18.5 and allowing 43.8 points per game (-25.3 per game).

College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between Central Connecticut by 34 and Mercyhurst by 11 about 80% of the time.

Mercyhurst gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Central Connecticut is still favoured on the road, so the ratings gap is bigger than the value of playing at home.

Result: Central Connecticut 43, Mercyhurst 40. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 8.4 points and the total by 21.3.

Market lines

Market lines · Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network · Updated Oct 29, 9:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.

ProviderSpread (open → now)Total (open → now)Moneyline (Central Connecticut / Mercyhurst)
ConsensusCentral Connecticut -7 → Central Connecticut -8.553.5 → 54.5-330 / +250
DraftKingsCentral Connecticut -7 → Central Connecticut -8.553.5 → 54.5-330 / +250

This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com · read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.

ProjectionMarginTotalMercyhurst win
Our modelCentral Connecticut -11.561.723%
Market consensusCentral Connecticut -8.554.527%
Blended projectionCentral Connecticut -955.427%

Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).

Model vs market

Mercyhurst win probability
model 23% · market (no-vig) 27% · difference -4 pts
Margin
model Central Connecticut -11.4 · market Central Connecticut -8.5 · difference -2.9 pts (Mercyhurst view)
Total
model 61.7 · market 54.5 · difference +7.2

Model margin is 2.9 pts more toward Central Connecticut than the market.

21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Original projection vs new formula

ProjectionScoreWin probMargin missTotal miss
Original projectionCentral Connecticut 36.6, Mercyhurst 25.2Central Connecticut 77%right winner8.421.3
New formulaCentral Connecticut 35.8, Mercyhurst 24.8Central Connecticut 77%right winner8.022.4

Final: Central Connecticut 43, Mercyhurst 40. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.

Central Connecticut vs Mercyhurst: stat comparison

2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).

Basic
StatCentral ConnecticutMercyhurst
Points per game26.718.8
Points allowed per game22.924.8
Yards per play5.645.28
Yards per play allowed5.976.13
Rushing yards per game140.3119.9
Net passing yards per game241.6202.8
Rushing yards allowed per game156.3197.1
Net passing yards allowed per game226.2172.0
Turnovers per game0.621.18
Takeaways per game0.850.64
Sacks per game2.150.82
Sacks allowed per game1.232.09
Advanced
StatCentral ConnecticutMercyhurst
EPA per play-0.00+0.01
EPA per play allowed+0.03+0.09
Success rate41.1%40.2%
Success rate allowed42.0%44.7%
Explosive play rate11.7%12.5%
Explosive plays allowed14.2%13.8%
Havoc rate12.8%11.6%
Havoc allowed11.6%16.2%
Points per scoring opportunity3.532.27
Points per opportunity allowed4.203.66
Average starting field positionopp 6opp 0
Opponents' starting field positionopp 6opp 0
Offensive plays per game (pace)67.761.1
Situational
StatCentral ConnecticutMercyhurst
Rushing EPA per play-0.13-0.05
Passing EPA per play+0.11+0.08
Rushing EPA allowed+0.06+0.04
Passing EPA allowed+0.01+0.15
Rushing success rate38.5%40.2%
Passing success rate45.7%39.4%
Run stuff rate21.1%21.7%
Passing-down success rate30.5%28.6%
Passing-down success allowed30.7%32.8%
Third-down conversion rate40.7%39.2%
Third-down rate allowed40.0%45.0%
Red-zone touchdown rate49.2%36.1%
Red-zone TD rate allowed63.9%57.6%

# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.

More: Central Connecticut schedule · Mercyhurst schedule · all Week 7 projections

Share this prediction

Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.

Free weekly projections email

One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only — no spam, unsubscribe any time.