Matchup analysis
Before kickoff our model projected Austin Peay 37.6, UT Martin 18.4 at Fortera Stadium in Week 4. That is a heavy edge: Austin Peay wins about 90% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 19.2 points and 55.9 combined points. Tags: favorite holds.
UT Martin is 1-3, scoring 23.5 and allowing 35 points per game (-11.5 per game). Austin Peay is 3-1, scoring 36.3 and allowing 17 points per game (+19.3 per game).
College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between UT Martin by 3 and Austin Peay by 42 about 80% of the time.
Austin Peay gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour Austin Peay by about 17.1. The game is on ESPN+.
Result: UT Martin 12, Austin Peay 35. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 3.8 points and the total by 8.9.
Market lines
Market lines · Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network · Updated Oct 29, 9:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.
| Provider | Spread (open → now) | Total (open → now) | Moneyline (UT Martin / Austin Peay) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Austin Peay -14.5 → Austin Peay -15.5 | 51.5 → 53.5 | +553 / -900 |
| DraftKings | Austin Peay -14.5 → Austin Peay -15.5 | 51.5 → 53.5 | +553 / -900 |
This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com · read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.
| Projection | Margin | Total | Austin Peay win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | Austin Peay -19 | 55.9 | 90% |
| Market consensus | Austin Peay -15.5 | 53.5 | 85% |
| Blended projection | Austin Peay -16 | 54.2 | 86% |
Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).
Model vs market
- Austin Peay win probability
- model 90% · market (no-vig) 85% · difference +4 pts
- Margin
- model Austin Peay -19.2 · market Austin Peay -15.5 · difference +3.7 pts (Austin Peay view)
- Total
- model 55.9 · market 53.5 · difference +2.4
Model margin is 3.7 pts more toward Austin Peay than the market.
21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.
Original projection vs new formula
| Projection | Score | Win prob | Margin miss | Total miss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original projection | UT Martin 18.4, Austin Peay 37.6 | Austin Peay 90%right winner | 3.8 | 8.9 |
| New formula | UT Martin 19.1, Austin Peay 36.0 | Austin Peay 87%right winner | 6.1 | 8.2 |
Final: UT Martin 12, Austin Peay 35. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.
UT Martin vs Austin Peay: stat comparison
2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).
| Stat | UT Martin | Austin Peay |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 20.7 | 35.1 |
| Points allowed per game | 23.9 | 27.3 |
| Yards per play | 5.25 | 6.90 |
| Yards per play allowed | 6.44 | 5.58 |
| Rushing yards per game | 172.7 | 195.7 |
| Net passing yards per game | 167.6 | 260.6 |
| Rushing yards allowed per game | 122.3 | 142.2 |
| Net passing yards allowed per game | 247.0 | 234.3 |
| Turnovers per game | 0.75 | 0.83 |
| Takeaways per game | 1.08 | 0.75 |
| Sacks per game | 2.08 | 2.25 |
| Sacks allowed per game | 2.00 | 1.58 |
| Stat | UT Martin | Austin Peay |
|---|---|---|
| EPA per play | -0.05 | +0.12 |
| EPA per play allowed | +0.10 | -0.01 |
| Success rate | 40.5% | 45.6% |
| Success rate allowed | 44.1% | 42.7% |
| Explosive play rate | 10.8% | 14.3% |
| Explosive plays allowed | 12.9% | 11.3% |
| Havoc rate | 12.0% | 12.0% |
| Havoc allowed | 12.4% | 10.7% |
| Points per scoring opportunity | 3.44 | 3.77 |
| Points per opportunity allowed | 4.78 | 3.74 |
| Average starting field position | opp 20 | opp 11 |
| Opponents' starting field position | opp 20 | opp 11 |
| Offensive plays per game (pace) | 64.8 | 66.2 |
| Stat | UT Martin | Austin Peay |
|---|---|---|
| Rushing EPA per play | -0.05 | +0.10 |
| Passing EPA per play | -0.06 | +0.14 |
| Rushing EPA allowed | -0.01 | +0.01 |
| Passing EPA allowed | +0.20 | -0.03 |
| Rushing success rate | 41.8% | 45.1% |
| Passing success rate | 41.6% | 46.0% |
| Run stuff rate | 18.0% | 17.7% |
| Passing-down success rate | 29.3% | 38.1% |
| Passing-down success allowed | 31.9% | 28.6% |
| Third-down conversion rate | 46.2% | 46.1% |
| Third-down rate allowed | 39.7% | 38.0% |
| Red-zone touchdown rate | 54.7% | 57.3% |
| Red-zone TD rate allowed | 71.2% | 62.7% |
# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.
More: UT Martin schedule · Austin Peay schedule · all Week 4 projections
Share this prediction
Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.
Free weekly projections email
One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only — no spam, unsubscribe any time.