Matchup analysis
Before kickoff our model projected Montana 34.4, Drake 21.5 at Washington-Grizzly Stadium in Week 1. That is a solid edge: Montana wins about 80% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 12.8 points and 55.9 combined points.
Drake is 0-1, scoring 35 and allowing 38 points per game (-3 per game). Montana is 1-0, scoring 28 and allowing 21 points per game (+7 per game).
College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between Drake by 10 and Montana by 35 about 80% of the time.
Montana gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour Montana by about 10.7. The game is on ESPN+.
Result: Drake 10, Montana 45. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 22.2 points and the total by 0.9.
Market lines
Market lines · Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network · Updated Oct 29, 9:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.
| Provider | Spread (open → now) | Total (open → now) | Moneyline (Drake / Montana) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Montana -34.5 → Montana -35.5 | 57.5 → 60.5 | — / — |
| DraftKings | Montana -34.5 → Montana -35.5 | 57.5 → 60.5 | — / — |
This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com · read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.
| Projection | Margin | Total | Montana win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | Montana -13 | 55.9 | 80% |
| Market consensus | Montana -35.5 | 60.5 | 99% |
| Blended projection | Montana -32 | 60.2 | 99% |
Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).
Model vs market
- Montana win probability
- model 80% · market (no-vig) —
- Margin
- model Montana -12.8 · market Montana -35.5 · difference -22.7 pts (Montana view)
- Total
- model 55.9 · market 60.5 · difference -4.6
Model margin is 22.7 pts more toward Drake than the market.
21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.
Original projection vs new formula
| Projection | Score | Win prob | Margin miss | Total miss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original projection | Drake 21.5, Montana 34.4 | Montana 80%right winner | 22.2 | 0.9 |
| New formula | Drake 21.0, Montana 36.1 | Montana 82%right winner | 19.9 | 2.0 |
Final: Drake 10, Montana 45. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.
Drake vs Montana: stat comparison
2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).
| Stat | Drake | Montana |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 25.3 | 41.0 |
| Points allowed per game | 17.7 | 25.4 |
| Yards per play | 6.07 | 6.57 |
| Yards per play allowed | 5.55 | 6.15 |
| Rushing yards per game | 211.3 | 172.4 |
| Net passing yards per game | 159.3 | 285.5 |
| Rushing yards allowed per game | 151.6 | 149.4 |
| Net passing yards allowed per game | 182.3 | 264.8 |
| Turnovers per game | 0.58 | 0.57 |
| Takeaways per game | 0.83 | 1.36 |
| Sacks per game | 2.25 | 2.21 |
| Sacks allowed per game | 1.58 | 1.50 |
| Stat | Drake | Montana |
|---|---|---|
| EPA per play | +0.03 | +0.16 |
| EPA per play allowed | +0.01 | +0.06 |
| Success rate | 42.6% | 45.4% |
| Success rate allowed | 42.8% | 39.5% |
| Explosive play rate | 12.6% | 14.4% |
| Explosive plays allowed | 11.0% | 12.3% |
| Havoc rate | 12.7% | 12.2% |
| Havoc allowed | 13.9% | 12.7% |
| Points per scoring opportunity | 3.66 | 0.00 |
| Points per opportunity allowed | 2.06 | 0.00 |
| Average starting field position | opp 0 | opp 0 |
| Opponents' starting field position | opp 0 | opp 0 |
| Offensive plays per game (pace) | 61.1 | 69.6 |
| Stat | Drake | Montana |
|---|---|---|
| Rushing EPA per play | +0.05 | +0.04 |
| Passing EPA per play | +0.00 | +0.27 |
| Rushing EPA allowed | +0.03 | +0.02 |
| Passing EPA allowed | -0.02 | +0.08 |
| Rushing success rate | 44.2% | 43.3% |
| Passing success rate | 42.4% | 48.7% |
| Run stuff rate | 18.9% | 24.3% |
| Passing-down success rate | 28.6% | 35.2% |
| Passing-down success allowed | 30.0% | 28.6% |
| Third-down conversion rate | 42.1% | 46.1% |
| Third-down rate allowed | 38.2% | 44.8% |
| Red-zone touchdown rate | 57.6% | 0.0% |
| Red-zone TD rate allowed | 36.6% | 0.0% |
# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.
More: Drake schedule · Montana schedule · all Week 1 projections
Share this prediction
Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.
Free weekly projections email
One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only — no spam, unsubscribe any time.