Skip to main content
All games

Utah Tech vs Montana: prediction and projected score

Final: Utah Tech 14, Montana 35. We projected Montana 35.9-15.7 (91%) โ€” winner called correctly.

Matchup analysis

Before kickoff our model projected Montana 35.9, Utah Tech 15.7 at Washington-Grizzly Stadium in Week 2. That is a heavy edge: Montana wins about 91% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 20.2 points and 51.5 combined points. Tags: favorite holds.

Utah Tech is 0-2, scoring 3.5 and allowing 58.5 points per game (-55 per game). Montana is 2-0, scoring 36.5 and allowing 15.5 points per game (+21 per game).

College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between Utah Tech by 2 and Montana by 43 about 80% of the time.

Montana gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour Montana by about 18.1. The game is on ESPN+.

Result: Utah Tech 14, Montana 35. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 0.8 points and the total by 2.5.

Market lines

Market lines ยท Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network ยท Updated Oct 29, 9:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.

ProviderSpread (open โ†’ now)Total (open โ†’ now)Moneyline (Utah Tech / Montana)
ConsensusMontana -38.5 โ†’ Montana -3756.5โ€” / โ€”
BovadaMontana -38.556.5โ€” / โ€”
DraftKingsMontana -38.5 โ†’ Montana -35.556.5โ€” / โ€”

This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com ยท read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.

ProjectionMarginTotalMontana win
Our modelMontana -2051.591%
Market consensusMontana -3756.599%
Blended projectionMontana -34.556.599%

Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).

Model vs market

Montana win probability
model 91% ยท market (no-vig) โ€”
Margin
model Montana -20.2 ยท market Montana -37 ยท difference -16.8 pts (Montana view)
Total
model 51.5 ยท market 56.5 ยท difference -5.0

Model margin is 16.8 pts more toward Utah Tech than the market.

21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Original projection vs new formula

ProjectionScoreWin probMargin missTotal miss
Original projectionUtah Tech 15.7, Montana 35.9Montana 91%right winner0.82.5
New formulaUtah Tech 12.8, Montana 43.5Montana 97%right winner9.67.3

Final: Utah Tech 14, Montana 35. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.

Utah Tech vs Montana: stat comparison

2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).

Basic
StatUtah TechMontana
Points per game16.041.0
Points allowed per game29.325.4
Yards per play5.056.57
Yards per play allowed5.686.15
Rushing yards per game139.8172.4
Net passing yards per game199.5285.5
Rushing yards allowed per game199.8149.4
Net passing yards allowed per game192.8264.8
Turnovers per game1.670.57
Takeaways per game0.921.36
Sacks per game1.752.21
Sacks allowed per game1.501.50
Advanced
StatUtah TechMontana
EPA per play-0.15+0.16
EPA per play allowed-0.01+0.06
Success rate37.4%45.4%
Success rate allowed41.1%39.5%
Explosive play rate8.9%14.4%
Explosive plays allowed11.4%12.3%
Havoc rate13.9%12.2%
Havoc allowed13.8%12.7%
Points per scoring opportunity2.570.00
Points per opportunity allowed3.660.00
Average starting field positionopp 0opp 0
Opponents' starting field positionopp 0opp 0
Offensive plays per game (pace)67.269.6
Situational
StatUtah TechMontana
Rushing EPA per play-0.07+0.04
Passing EPA per play-0.23+0.27
Rushing EPA allowed+0.02+0.02
Passing EPA allowed-0.04+0.08
Rushing success rate39.8%43.3%
Passing success rate34.5%48.7%
Run stuff rate14.8%24.3%
Passing-down success rate26.4%35.2%
Passing-down success allowed30.8%28.6%
Third-down conversion rate39.2%46.1%
Third-down rate allowed44.3%44.8%
Red-zone touchdown rate48.7%0.0%
Red-zone TD rate allowed57.6%0.0%

# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.

More: Utah Tech schedule ยท Montana schedule ยท all Week 2 projections

Share this prediction

Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.

Free weekly projections email

One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only โ€” no spam, unsubscribe any time.