Matchup analysis
Our model projects Gardner-Webb 29, Lindenwood 19 at Ernest W. Spangler Stadium in Week 10. That is a solid edge: Gardner-Webb wins about 73% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 9.5 points and 48.2 combined points.
Lindenwood is 3-4 against the 50th-toughest schedule so far, scoring 22.9 and allowing 27.1 points per game (-4.2 per game). Gardner-Webb is 2-6 against the 16th-toughest schedule so far, scoring 19.6 and allowing 22.5 points per game (-2.9 per game).
College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between Lindenwood by 13 and Gardner-Webb by 32 about 80% of the time.
Gardner-Webb gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour Gardner-Webb by about 7.4. The game is on ESPN+.
Market lines
Market lines · Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network · Updated Oct 29, 11:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.
No market line has been posted for this game yet.
21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.
Lindenwood vs Gardner-Webb: stat comparison
| Stat | Lindenwood | Gardner-Webb |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 22.9 | 19.6 |
| Points allowed per game | 27.1 | 22.5 |
| Yards per play | 5.64 | 5.20 |
| Yards per play allowed | 6.22 | 5.48 |
| Rushing yards per game | 173.0 | 108.6 |
| Net passing yards per game | 168.9 | 250.5 |
| Rushing yards allowed per game | 155.0 | 169.8 |
| Net passing yards allowed per game | 260.1 | 164.3 |
| Turnovers per game | 0.43 | 1.63 |
| Takeaways per game | 1.14 | 1.13 |
| Sacks per game | 1.29 | 2.75 |
| Sacks allowed per game | 2.14 | 1.38 |
| Stat | Lindenwood | Gardner-Webb |
|---|---|---|
| EPA per play | -0.01 | -0.07 |
| EPA per play allowed | +0.11 | -0.12 |
| Success rate | 35.6% | 37.1% |
| Success rate allowed | 45.7% | 35.6% |
| Explosive play rate | 11.3% | 10.6% |
| Explosive plays allowed | 13.9% | 12.0% |
| Havoc rate | 10.0% | 17.2% |
| Havoc allowed | 17.1% | 15.0% |
| Points per scoring opportunity | 3.25 | 2.99 |
| Points per opportunity allowed | 3.97 | 3.24 |
| Average starting field position | opp 19 | opp 17 |
| Opponents' starting field position | opp 18 | opp 17 |
| Offensive plays per game (pace) | 60.6 | 69.0 |
| Stat | Lindenwood | Gardner-Webb |
|---|---|---|
| Rushing EPA per play | -0.01 | -0.09 |
| Passing EPA per play | +0.01 | -0.05 |
| Rushing EPA allowed | +0.15 | -0.12 |
| Passing EPA allowed | +0.07 | -0.10 |
| Rushing success rate | 31.1% | 32.6% |
| Passing success rate | 35.3% | 36.2% |
| Run stuff rate | 23.7% | 24.6% |
| Passing-down success rate | 26.3% | 26.5% |
| Passing-down success allowed | 27.5% | 26.7% |
| Third-down conversion rate | 35.4% | 32.5% |
| Third-down rate allowed | 44.9% | 27.4% |
| Red-zone touchdown rate | 54.9% | 42.8% |
| Red-zone TD rate allowed | 71.7% | 50.4% |
# = rank among 138 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.
More: Lindenwood schedule · Gardner-Webb schedule · all Week 10 projections
Share this prediction
Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.
Free weekly projections email
One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only — no spam, unsubscribe any time.