Matchup analysis
Before kickoff our model projected Drake 33.5, Davidson 24 at Richardson Stadium (Davidson, NC) in Week 4. That is a solid edge: Drake wins about 73% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 9.5 points and 57.5 combined points.
Drake is 0-3, scoring 19.7 and allowing 46.3 points per game (-26.6 per game). Davidson is 2-2, scoring 22.5 and allowing 29.3 points per game (-6.8 per game).
College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between Drake by 32 and Davidson by 13 about 80% of the time.
Davidson gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Drake is still favoured on the road, so the ratings gap is bigger than the value of playing at home. The game is on ESPN+.
Result: Drake 51, Davidson 32. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 9.5 points and the total by 25.5.
Market lines
Market lines · Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network · Updated Oct 29, 11:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.
| Provider | Spread (open → now) | Total (open → now) | Moneyline (Drake / Davidson) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Drake -12.5 → Drake -11.5 | 53.5 → 58.5 | -433 / +316 |
| DraftKings | Drake -12.5 → Drake -11.5 | 53.5 → 58.5 | -433 / +316 |
This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com · read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.
| Projection | Margin | Total | Davidson win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | Drake -9.5 | 57.5 | 27% |
| Market consensus | Drake -11.5 | 58.5 | 23% |
| Blended projection | Drake -11 | 58.6 | 22% |
Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).
Model vs market
- Davidson win probability
- model 27% · market (no-vig) 23% · difference +4 pts
- Margin
- model Drake -9.5 · market Drake -11.5 · difference +2.0 pts (Davidson view)
- Total
- model 57.5 · market 58.5 · difference -1.0
Model margin is 2.0 pts more toward Davidson than the market.
21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.
Original projection vs new formula
| Projection | Score | Win prob | Margin miss | Total miss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original projection | Drake 33.5, Davidson 24.0 | Drake 73%right winner | 9.5 | 25.5 |
| New formula | Drake 34.1, Davidson 22.9 | Drake 77%right winner | 7.8 | 26.0 |
Final: Drake 51, Davidson 32. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.
Drake vs Davidson: stat comparison
2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).
| Stat | Drake | Davidson |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 25.3 | 18.2 |
| Points allowed per game | 17.7 | 39.6 |
| Yards per play | 6.07 | 5.10 |
| Yards per play allowed | 5.55 | 7.09 |
| Rushing yards per game | 211.3 | 133.1 |
| Net passing yards per game | 159.3 | 190.5 |
| Rushing yards allowed per game | 151.6 | 246.2 |
| Net passing yards allowed per game | 182.3 | 237.6 |
| Turnovers per game | 0.58 | 1.17 |
| Takeaways per game | 0.83 | 1.08 |
| Sacks per game | 2.25 | 1.00 |
| Sacks allowed per game | 1.58 | 2.58 |
| Stat | Drake | Davidson |
|---|---|---|
| EPA per play | +0.03 | -0.04 |
| EPA per play allowed | +0.01 | +0.18 |
| Success rate | 42.6% | 37.5% |
| Success rate allowed | 42.8% | 52.0% |
| Explosive play rate | 12.6% | 10.9% |
| Explosive plays allowed | 11.0% | 16.1% |
| Havoc rate | 12.7% | 8.9% |
| Havoc allowed | 13.9% | 13.5% |
| Points per scoring opportunity | 3.66 | 3.24 |
| Points per opportunity allowed | 2.06 | 2.81 |
| Average starting field position | opp 0 | opp 0 |
| Opponents' starting field position | opp 0 | opp 0 |
| Offensive plays per game (pace) | 61.1 | 63.4 |
| Stat | Drake | Davidson |
|---|---|---|
| Rushing EPA per play | +0.05 | -0.02 |
| Passing EPA per play | +0.00 | -0.07 |
| Rushing EPA allowed | +0.03 | +0.23 |
| Passing EPA allowed | -0.02 | +0.10 |
| Rushing success rate | 44.2% | 38.8% |
| Passing success rate | 42.4% | 36.1% |
| Run stuff rate | 18.9% | 20.7% |
| Passing-down success rate | 28.6% | 27.2% |
| Passing-down success allowed | 30.0% | 36.0% |
| Third-down conversion rate | 42.1% | 36.0% |
| Third-down rate allowed | 38.2% | 48.1% |
| Red-zone touchdown rate | 57.6% | 46.5% |
| Red-zone TD rate allowed | 36.6% | 50.8% |
# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.
More: Drake schedule · Davidson schedule · all Week 4 projections
Share this prediction
Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.
Free weekly projections email
One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only — no spam, unsubscribe any time.