Matchup analysis
Our model projects Chattanooga 41, VMI 3 at Finley Stadium in Week 9. That is a heavy edge: Chattanooga wins about 99% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 38.6 points and 44.3 combined points. Tags: favorite holds, blowout brewing, leans low scoring.
VMI is 0-8 against the 71st-toughest schedule so far, scoring 8 and allowing 41.3 points per game (-33.3 per game). Chattanooga is 5-3 against the 87th-toughest schedule so far, scoring 22.6 and allowing 13.3 points per game (+9.3 per game).
College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between Chattanooga by 16 and Chattanooga by 61 about 80% of the time.
Chattanooga gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour Chattanooga by about 36.5. The game is on ESPN+.
Market lines
Market lines ยท Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network ยท Updated Oct 29, 11:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.
No market line has been posted for this game yet.
21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.
VMI vs Chattanooga: stat comparison
| Stat | VMI | Chattanooga |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 8.0 | 22.6 |
| Points allowed per game | 41.3 | 13.3 |
| Yards per play | 3.75 | 4.91 |
| Yards per play allowed | 7.38 | 4.73 |
| Rushing yards per game | 138.1 | 208.4 |
| Net passing yards per game | 64.4 | 76.6 |
| Rushing yards allowed per game | 227.4 | 131.0 |
| Net passing yards allowed per game | 278.4 | 152.0 |
| Turnovers per game | 0.88 | 0.38 |
| Takeaways per game | 0.63 | 1.13 |
| Sacks per game | 1.38 | 2.75 |
| Sacks allowed per game | 2.13 | 2.13 |
| Stat | VMI | Chattanooga |
|---|---|---|
| EPA per play | -0.22 | -0.02 |
| EPA per play allowed | +0.24 | -0.12 |
| Success rate | 29.4% | 37.6% |
| Success rate allowed | 51.4% | 35.8% |
| Explosive play rate | 6.5% | 11.1% |
| Explosive plays allowed | 16.2% | 9.9% |
| Havoc rate | 10.8% | 16.6% |
| Havoc allowed | 19.2% | 14.5% |
| Points per scoring opportunity | 2.13 | 2.98 |
| Points per opportunity allowed | 4.26 | 3.22 |
| Average starting field position | opp 11 | opp 0 |
| Opponents' starting field position | opp 8 | opp 0 |
| Offensive plays per game (pace) | 54.0 | 58.0 |
| Stat | VMI | Chattanooga |
|---|---|---|
| Rushing EPA per play | -0.18 | +0.06 |
| Passing EPA per play | -0.31 | -0.19 |
| Rushing EPA allowed | +0.24 | -0.05 |
| Passing EPA allowed | +0.24 | -0.20 |
| Rushing success rate | 27.1% | 40.1% |
| Passing success rate | 23.3% | 29.3% |
| Run stuff rate | 26.4% | 18.4% |
| Passing-down success rate | 17.4% | 26.1% |
| Passing-down success allowed | 32.2% | 21.0% |
| Third-down conversion rate | 26.8% | 38.5% |
| Third-down rate allowed | 38.7% | 31.5% |
| Red-zone touchdown rate | 42.0% | 57.6% |
| Red-zone TD rate allowed | 64.8% | 50.1% |
# = rank among 138 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.
More: VMI schedule ยท Chattanooga schedule ยท all Week 9 projections
Share this prediction
Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.
Free weekly projections email
One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only โ no spam, unsubscribe any time.