Matchup analysis
Before kickoff our model projected Mercer 32.2, Furman 21.6 at Five Star Stadium in Week 2. That is a solid edge: Mercer wins about 76% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 10.6 points and 53.8 combined points.
Furman is 1-1, scoring 14.5 and allowing 29.5 points per game (-15 per game). Mercer is 2-0, scoring 42.5 and allowing 9 points per game (+33.5 per game).
College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between Furman by 12 and Mercer by 33 about 80% of the time.
Mercer gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour Mercer by about 8.5. The game is on ESPN+.
Result: Furman 20, Mercer 13. Furman won, so this goes down as a miss for the model (margin off by 17.6 points).
Market lines
Market lines · Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network · Updated Oct 29, 9:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.
| Provider | Spread (open → now) | Total (open → now) | Moneyline (Furman / Mercer) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Mercer -15.5 | 54.5 | +406 / -590 |
| DraftKings | Mercer -15.5 | 54.5 | +406 / -590 |
This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com · read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.
| Projection | Margin | Total | Mercer win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | Mercer -10.5 | 53.8 | 76% |
| Market consensus | Mercer -15.5 | 54.5 | 81% |
| Blended projection | Mercer -15 | 54.9 | 84% |
Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).
Model vs market
- Mercer win probability
- model 76% · market (no-vig) 81% · difference -6 pts
- Margin
- model Mercer -10.6 · market Mercer -15.5 · difference -4.9 pts (Mercer view)
- Total
- model 53.8 · market 54.5 · difference -0.7
Model margin is 4.9 pts more toward Furman than the market.
21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.
Original projection vs new formula
| Projection | Score | Win prob | Margin miss | Total miss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original projection | Furman 21.6, Mercer 32.2 | Mercer 76%wrong winner | 17.6 | 20.8 |
| New formula | Furman 15.5, Mercer 37.2 | Mercer 91%wrong winner | 28.7 | 19.6 |
Final: Furman 20, Mercer 13. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.
Furman vs Mercer: stat comparison
2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).
| Stat | Furman | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 24.4 | 36.2 |
| Points allowed per game | 31.0 | 25.5 |
| Yards per play | 5.48 | 7.32 |
| Yards per play allowed | 6.42 | 5.93 |
| Rushing yards per game | 113.8 | 171.9 |
| Net passing yards per game | 243.9 | 353.3 |
| Rushing yards allowed per game | 187.8 | 134.3 |
| Net passing yards allowed per game | 245.9 | 232.7 |
| Turnovers per game | 1.42 | 1.50 |
| Takeaways per game | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Sacks per game | 1.92 | 3.42 |
| Sacks allowed per game | 1.75 | 0.42 |
| Stat | Furman | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| EPA per play | -0.06 | +0.09 |
| EPA per play allowed | +0.04 | -0.06 |
| Success rate | 40.8% | 44.9% |
| Success rate allowed | 44.7% | 35.1% |
| Explosive play rate | 11.0% | 15.2% |
| Explosive plays allowed | 13.4% | 12.5% |
| Havoc rate | 10.9% | 15.9% |
| Havoc allowed | 14.0% | 11.2% |
| Points per scoring opportunity | 3.61 | 3.31 |
| Points per opportunity allowed | 3.98 | 3.47 |
| Average starting field position | opp 7 | opp 6 |
| Opponents' starting field position | opp 6 | opp 5 |
| Offensive plays per game (pace) | 65.3 | 71.8 |
| Stat | Furman | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| Rushing EPA per play | -0.12 | +0.00 |
| Passing EPA per play | -0.03 | +0.16 |
| Rushing EPA allowed | +0.03 | -0.18 |
| Passing EPA allowed | +0.03 | +0.05 |
| Rushing success rate | 38.7% | 40.2% |
| Passing success rate | 43.2% | 50.3% |
| Run stuff rate | 18.7% | 17.9% |
| Passing-down success rate | 29.9% | 33.8% |
| Passing-down success allowed | 33.1% | 29.2% |
| Third-down conversion rate | 40.0% | 51.2% |
| Third-down rate allowed | 41.8% | 35.3% |
| Red-zone touchdown rate | 56.2% | 62.4% |
| Red-zone TD rate allowed | 56.3% | 61.1% |
# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.
More: Furman schedule · Mercer schedule · all Week 2 projections
Share this prediction
Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.
Free weekly projections email
One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only — no spam, unsubscribe any time.