Skip to main content
All games

Northwestern State vs East Texas A&M: prediction and projected score

Final: Northwestern State 14, East Texas A&M 38. We projected East Texas A&M 34.3-25.9 (71%) — winner called correctly.

Matchup analysis

Before kickoff our model projected East Texas A&M 34.3, Northwestern State 25.9 at Memorial Stadium (Commerce, TX) in Week 2. That is a solid edge: East Texas A&M wins about 71% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 8.4 points and 60.2 combined points. Tags: leans high scoring.

Northwestern State is 0-2, scoring 21.5 and allowing 61 points per game (-39.5 per game). East Texas A&M is 0-2, scoring 11 and allowing 33.5 points per game (-22.5 per game).

College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between Northwestern State by 14 and East Texas A&M by 31 about 80% of the time.

East Texas A&M gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour East Texas A&M by about 6.3. The game is on ESPN+.

Result: Northwestern State 14, East Texas A&M 38. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 15.6 points and the total by 8.2.

Market lines

Market lines · Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network · Updated Oct 29, 11:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.

ProviderSpread (open → now)Total (open → now)Moneyline (Northwestern State / East Texas A&M)
ConsensusEast Texas A&M -20.551.5 → 53.5+710 / -1320
DraftKingsEast Texas A&M -20.551.5 → 53.5+710 / -1320

This game's lines: CollegeFootballData.com · read Oct 22, 6:37 PM UTC.

ProjectionMarginTotalEast Texas A&M win
Our modelEast Texas A&M -8.560.271%
Market consensusEast Texas A&M -20.553.588%
Blended projectionEast Texas A&M -18.554.490%

Blended projection = 0.16 x our margin + 0.84 x the market margin, weights fitted on past seasons (see methodology).

Model vs market

East Texas A&M win probability
model 71% · market (no-vig) 88% · difference -17 pts
Margin
model East Texas A&M -8.4 · market East Texas A&M -20.5 · difference -12.1 pts (East Texas A&M view)
Total
model 60.2 · market 53.5 · difference +6.7

Model margin is 12.1 pts more toward Northwestern State than the market.

21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Original projection vs new formula

ProjectionScoreWin probMargin missTotal miss
Original projectionNorthwestern State 25.9, East Texas A&M 34.3East Texas A&M 71%right winner15.68.2
New formulaNorthwestern State 16.5, East Texas A&M 46.2East Texas A&M 97%right winner5.710.7

Final: Northwestern State 14, East Texas A&M 38. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.

Northwestern State vs East Texas A&M: stat comparison

2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).

Basic
StatNorthwestern StateEast Texas A&M
Points per game10.525.6
Points allowed per game41.639.8
Yards per play4.405.89
Yards per play allowed7.276.34
Rushing yards per game120.6136.8
Net passing yards per game118.6269.0
Rushing yards allowed per game254.6193.6
Net passing yards allowed per game213.6246.3
Turnovers per game1.331.75
Takeaways per game0.751.17
Sacks per game1.081.83
Sacks allowed per game2.082.83
Advanced
StatNorthwestern StateEast Texas A&M
EPA per play-0.19-0.03
EPA per play allowed+0.19+0.06
Success rate33.5%42.3%
Success rate allowed49.6%45.3%
Explosive play rate11.2%13.3%
Explosive plays allowed16.1%13.2%
Havoc rate9.7%11.0%
Havoc allowed17.5%14.9%
Points per scoring opportunity1.963.29
Points per opportunity allowed4.464.04
Average starting field positionopp 14opp 13
Opponents' starting field positionopp 9opp 10
Offensive plays per game (pace)54.368.9
Situational
StatNorthwestern StateEast Texas A&M
Rushing EPA per play-0.15+0.06
Passing EPA per play-0.24-0.11
Rushing EPA allowed+0.24+0.03
Passing EPA allowed+0.12+0.10
Rushing success rate32.8%43.8%
Passing success rate28.4%39.8%
Run stuff rate26.6%17.9%
Passing-down success rate24.9%30.1%
Passing-down success allowed33.2%33.2%
Third-down conversion rate25.8%39.6%
Third-down rate allowed43.5%44.6%
Red-zone touchdown rate36.2%42.2%
Red-zone TD rate allowed68.6%48.3%

# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.

More: Northwestern State schedule · East Texas A&M schedule · all Week 2 projections

Share this prediction

Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.

Free weekly projections email

One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only — no spam, unsubscribe any time.