Skip to main content
All games

McNeese vs Incarnate Word: prediction and projected score

Final: McNeese 6, Incarnate Word 38. We projected Incarnate Word 33.1-22.1 (76%) โ€” winner called correctly.

Matchup analysis

Before kickoff our model projected Incarnate Word 33.1, McNeese 22.1 at Gayle and Tom Benson Stadium in Week 8. That is a solid edge: Incarnate Word wins about 76% of the time by our estimate, with a projected margin of 11 points and 55.1 combined points.

McNeese is 3-4, scoring 25.4 and allowing 28.6 points per game (-3.2 per game). Incarnate Word is 3-4, scoring 35.1 and allowing 31.4 points per game (+3.7 per game).

College football is noisy: even a well-rated projection misses the final margin by about 14 points on average. Based on how real results have scattered around our numbers, the final margin should land somewhere between McNeese by 12 and Incarnate Word by 34 about 80% of the time.

Incarnate Word gets about 2.1 points for playing at home. Even on a neutral field the ratings would still favour Incarnate Word by about 8.9. The game is on ESPN+.

Result: McNeese 6, Incarnate Word 38. The model had the right winner; the margin was off by 21 points and the total by 11.1.

Market lines

Market lines ยท Source: The Odds API, ESPN, Action Network ยท Updated Oct 29, 11:25 AM UTC. Shown for information; not an input to our projections.

No market line has been posted for this game yet.

21+ only where legal. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Original projection vs new formula

ProjectionScoreWin probMargin missTotal miss
Original projectionMcNeese 22.1, Incarnate Word 33.1Incarnate Word 76%right winner21.011.1
New formulaNot recorded for this game

Final: McNeese 6, Incarnate Word 38. Original = the number we posted before kickoff. New formula (2026-10-21 matchup terms) = the current model re-run with only the games played before this one.

McNeese vs Incarnate Word: stat comparison

2025 season numbers (this season's sample is still too small).

Basic
StatMcNeeseIncarnate Word
Points per game23.525.7
Points allowed per game25.525.5
Yards per play6.105.27
Yards per play allowed6.015.74
Rushing yards per game213.5158.9
Net passing yards per game196.0239.6
Rushing yards allowed per game205.9116.5
Net passing yards allowed per game170.1243.3
Turnovers per game1.581.27
Takeaways per game1.080.55
Sacks per game2.081.73
Sacks allowed per game2.332.91
Advanced
StatMcNeeseIncarnate Word
EPA per play0.00-0.03
EPA per play allowed+0.08+0.03
Success rate42.1%41.9%
Success rate allowed43.1%39.9%
Explosive play rate13.0%10.0%
Explosive plays allowed13.8%11.9%
Havoc rate14.0%13.7%
Havoc allowed11.8%14.5%
Points per scoring opportunity2.973.01
Points per opportunity allowed3.583.62
Average starting field positionopp 12opp 8
Opponents' starting field positionopp 11opp 7
Offensive plays per game (pace)67.275.6
Situational
StatMcNeeseIncarnate Word
Rushing EPA per play+0.04+0.00
Passing EPA per play-0.04-0.05
Rushing EPA allowed+0.14-0.14
Passing EPA allowed+0.01+0.16
Rushing success rate45.1%43.9%
Passing success rate39.9%40.1%
Run stuff rate14.1%18.5%
Passing-down success rate29.2%27.7%
Passing-down success allowed32.6%29.2%
Third-down conversion rate40.9%40.0%
Third-down rate allowed42.4%36.3%
Red-zone touchdown rate56.2%41.4%
Red-zone TD rate allowed51.8%51.3%

# = rank among 136 FBS teams. Efficiency numbers exclude garbage time. Per-play numbers of teams with a weak schedule are pulled toward their opponent-adjusted values (fully at one standard deviation below an average schedule). Source: play-by-play (cfbfastR / sportsdataverse), aggregated by us.

More: McNeese schedule ยท Incarnate Word schedule ยท all Week 8 projections

Share this prediction

Projections are statistical estimates for entertainment and analysis only. They are not betting advice and nothing here guarantees any result.

Free weekly projections email

One email a week in season: the closest projected games, the biggest mismatches and how the model graded out last week. Email address only โ€” no spam, unsubscribe any time.